Am I "Average"? Am I Okay with That Label?
Most athletes claim they want to maximize their potential. Few are prepared to examine the behavioral and cognitive patterns required to achieve it. The question, "Am I average?" is not meant to shame — it is a clinical diagnostic tool.
Your honest answer determines whether your current behaviors align with the outcomes you claim to want or whether they are quietly engineered for comfort and ego preservation.
The Misinterpretation of Effort
Effort is often mistaken for improvement. Many athletes put in long hours, yet their technique regresses and weaknesses multiply. Without clear objectives and immediate feedback, repetition simply ingrains poor habits deeper.
Deliberate practice — the backbone of skill refinement — demands specific, measurable goals and full cognitive engagement. It is not about being busy; it is about being precise. For example, an athlete who repeatedly practices shooting without addressing footwork errors merely cements the flaw. Repetition without adjustment ingrains weakness, not skill.
The Protective Role of Excuses
Excuses serve a critical psychological function: they protect the athlete's self-concept from discomfort. Blaming referees, coaches, teammates, or conditions provides a mental exit from self-accountability.
An athlete who blames a coach for reduced playing time avoids facing poor defensive habits or inconsistent intensity. Over time, these external attributions create a fragile identity dependent on external conditions rather than internal adaptability.
By shielding themselves from blame, athletes sacrifice growth, building psychological walls that eventually become performance ceilings.
The Avoidance of Technical Precision
Technical precision demands vulnerability. It exposes flaws and requires athletes to dismantle aspects of their game they may have always relied on.
Consider an athlete avoiding slow-motion breakdown drills because they reveal timing errors in shooting mechanics. Instead, they default to full-speed sessions where sloppiness hides behind pace.
Precision also forces immediate self-confrontation: subtle adjustments to foot angles, hand positions, or balance. This detail-oriented work is often labeled as "boring" or "tedious" precisely because it eliminates hiding places. Those unwilling to submit to this discomfort ultimately self-select out of elite performance.
The Addiction to Validation
The current athlete culture is driven by highlight reels and online engagement metrics. Visibility has been misinterpreted as evidence of value.
An athlete curating daily social clips may appear committed but often redirects critical focus away from technical correction and long-term development. By chasing daily affirmation, they sacrifice the private, repetitive, and often unglamorous work that underpins true progression.
When identity hinges on public approval, emotional resilience erodes. Performance becomes reactive to feedback rather than anchored in self-defined standards.
The Conflict of Identity
Athletes who over-identify with "natural talent" avoid scenarios that might reveal deficiencies. They decline invitations to high-level camps, dodge stronger opponents, or resist new skill challenges to protect their reputation.
This identity, anchored in innate ability rather than adaptive growth, becomes a prison. Over time, the fear of exposure outweighs the hunger for development. In contrast, athletes with a learning-based identity actively seek disconfirming experiences. They view weaknesses as actionable data, not threats to their value.
Cognitive Distortions: The Silent Saboteurs
Cognitive distortions silently undermine performance. All-or-nothing thinking ("If I'm not the best today, I'm a failure"), catastrophizing small errors ("This miss means I'm not good enough"), and overgeneralizing ("I always choke in big moments") distort self-assessment.
These mental errors create avoidance behaviors and increase performance anxiety. Reframing these thoughts into specific, controllable feedback ("I missed because my elbow drifted; I can correct that") transforms setbacks into data-driven adjustments.
Elite athletes learn to recognize, label, and restructure these distortions, converting them from saboteurs into allies for growth.
Emotional Regulation and Composure
Technical and tactical skills are ineffective without emotional stability under stress. The capacity to execute under fatigue, in high-pressure situations, or after errors differentiates consistent performers from those who crumble.
Composure is not innate; it is systematically developed through exposure to controlled adversity. Drills simulating end-game scenarios, practicing under fatigue, and creating artificial stakes during training forge psychological resilience.
Athletes who actively train composure can stabilize cognitive processing and maintain motor precision when others default to emotional survival modes.
The Psychological Fork
Athletes face a consistent binary choice: confront deficiencies or preserve ego.
Choosing confrontation initiates neural adaptation, skill recalibration, and psychological growth. Choosing preservation cements existing behaviors and narratives, ensuring decline.
This choice is made repeatedly in micro-decisions: whether to accept critical feedback, whether to fix technical details, whether to train when unmotivated. Over time, these choices shape not only performance but identity.
"Am I average?" is not an insult; it is an operational audit. It demands lucidity on whether your habits, thought patterns, and daily standards align with your ambitions or merely perform the illusion of commitment.
Elite performers opt for rigorous self-examination, behavioral accountability, and strategic discomfort. They understand that standards are indifferent to feelings and that progress lives on the other side of ego death.
To operationalize these concepts, use the Athlete Performance Audit below. Apply it without self-deception. Standards do not care about your comfort.
Athlete Performance Audit
Mindset
Did I execute today’s plan regardless of emotional state?
Was I focused on controllable behaviors rather than external outcomes?
Did I approach setbacks today as data points rather than personal failures?
Did I prioritize long-term mastery over immediate validation?
Training Process
Did I train with objective measures and targeted feedback?
Was every repetition purposeful and aligned with technical refinement?
Did I maintain full cognitive focus throughout, or did I allow mental drift?
Did I intelligently adapt my plan when unexpected challenges arose?
Recovery & Lifestyle
Did I adhere to my recovery protocols (sleep, nutrition, mobility) without compromise?
Did I actively manage psychological stress to support performance?
Were my lifestyle and social choices today aligned with my identity as an athlete?
Accountability
Where did I avoid responsibility today?
Is this avoidance a recurring pattern?
Did I actively seek honest feedback from a coach or peer today?
What specific corrective action will I take tomorrow?
Precision & Detail
What technical weakness did I directly address today?
Did I invite and integrate feedback, or did I protect my comfort zone?
Did I engage in visualization or mental rehearsal to reinforce changes?
Did I test technical corrections under fatigue or pressure?
Validation
Did I seek external approval today, or did I rely on internal standards?
Would I perform the same way if no one was watching?
Did I make choices to satisfy perception rather than improve competence?
Is my private commitment to standards consistent with my public persona?
Bibliography
Andersen, Mark B., and William F. Straub.
Developing Sport Psychology Programs: From Theory to Practice. Fitness Information Technology, 1997.
Baumeister, Roy F., and John Tierney.
Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. Penguin Press, 2011.
Dweck, Carol S.
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House, 2006.
Ericsson, Anders K., and Robert Pool.
Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016.
Gervais, Michael.
Finding Mastery: High Performance Lessons from the World’s Best Minds. Podcast series, various episodes.
Hardy, Lew, Graham Jones, and Daniel Gould.
Understanding Psychological Preparation for Sport: Theory and Practice of Elite Performers. Wiley-Blackwell, 1996.
Kremer, John, Aidan Moran, Graham Walker, and Cathy Craig.
Key Concepts in Sport Psychology. SAGE Publications, 2011.
Orlick, Terry.
In Pursuit of Excellence: How to Win in Sport and Life Through Mental Training. Human Kinetics, 2008.
Vealey, Robin S.
Coaching for the Inner Edge. Fitness Information Technology, 2005.
Weinberg, Robert S., and Daniel Gould.
Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Human Kinetics, 7th edition, 2018.